The anonymity of results based on genome data must always be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

1. Rare individual genetic variations

Publishing rare significant genetic findings is as a rule permitted if the variation is found in at least three individuals. If fewer than three individuals share the variation, the exact number should be concealed.

When publishing such findings, particular attention must be paid to the risk of identification. A minimum frequency threshold of n=3 may help reduce this risk, but its sufficiency should be evaluated in each case. The smaller the target group and the more background information is provided (such as phenotype or geographical origin) the higher the risk of identifying individuals.

When publishing results related to individual subjects, you must not include:

    • exact age,
    • a detailed description of the subject’s phenotype,
    • medical history,
    • the exact geographical area where the subjects were collected, or
    • any other information that could compromise the anonymity of the subjects.

    Details of the genetic variation may be published if they are already available in public variant databases, including:

    • allele frequency,
    • clinical significance of the variant,
    • rsID identifying the variant, or
    • the research method used to identify it.

    Table 2 provides an example of how to publish rare genetic findings.

    Causal geneDisorderPatient NZygosity of variantReference transcriptDNA variantProtein variantMolecular consequencePathogenicity classificationdb SNP IDgnomAD MAF, EuropeangnomAD MAF, FinnishSpliceAIphyloPCADD
    EPHA2Lung cancer<3HeterozygousNM_004431.5c.1171G>Cp.Gly291Argmissense variantLikely pathogenicrs341925490.016790.009470.01000.1356.37
    NRASLung cancer5HeterozygousNM_002524.5c.183A>Cp.Gln61Hismissense variantPathogenic/Likely pathogenicrs121913255NANANANANA
    DDR2Lung cancer<3HeterozygousNM_006182.4c.716T>Gp.Leu239Argmissense variantLikely pathogenicrs5780152160.0000.0000.0006,3224.5
    Table 2. Example of reporting rare genetic findings

    Genetic variations not present in the individual’s own genome

    Time-bound genetic mutations that do not occur in the subject’s genome, such as those found in cancer tumours, may be published at an individual level. However, extra caution must be taken to ensure individuals cannot be identified.

    When publishing results related to individual subjects, you must not include:

    • exact age,
    • a detailed description of the subject’s phenotype,
    • medical history,
    • the exact geographical area where the subjects were collected, or
    • any other information that could compromise the anonymity of the subjects.

    Where possible, results should be presented in grouped form based on mutation or person classifications.

    3. Genealogical research

    When publishing genealogical results, the anonymity of extended family members must be ensured. Hereditary genetic changes identified through genealogical studies may be presented as pedigrees, as illustrated in Figure 1.

    When presenting persons in a pedigree, you cannot include any other detailed background information about them, such as:

    • age,
    • time of discovery of the genetic changes,
    • geographical area from which the genealogical history has been collected, or
    • any other information that endangers the anonymity of the family.

    The more detailed the information, the greater the risk of identification. In cases of very rare diseases, it is possible that a pedigree cannot be published in anonymous format.

    Figure 1. Example of pedigree reporting